Free Bobby Buckner

In the relentless pursuit of justice, truth must be the foundation. But in the case of Bobby Joe Buckner , the truth was sidelined — hidden beneath a wave of prosecutorial omission, suspect testimony, and a broken system that failed to call a key witness: Dr. Sudhir Madisetty . 🔍 The Problem: Unverified Testimony At the center of Bobby's conviction lies the testimony of Margaret Lopez , the grandmother of the alleged victim. She claimed under oath that Dr. Madisetty, a pediatrician, suspected sexual abuse and offered to conduct confirmatory tests — which she declined. Yet, Dr. Madisetty was never called to testify . Why would a pediatrician, legally obligated under Texas Family Code §261.101 to report suspected abuse, stay silent? He didn’t. There’s no record of any report. No medical confirmation. Just one woman’s claim — unchallenged by the prosecution, unchecked by cross-examination. 📄 The Law Is Clear Doctors are mandatory reporters. If Dr. Madisetty had suspected abuse...

  When the Judge Steps Aside: What Bobby Buckner’s Case Reveals Justice is not just about verdicts—it’s about the integrity of the process. In Bobby Joe Buckner’s case , that integrity was so compromised that even the judge assigned to the case, Judge Matt Johnson , was later forced to recuse himself. Here’s what happened: Judge Johnson was the official judge of record. But when the trial began, he was on vacation. In his absence, Judge Ralph Strother filled in and presided over the trial. Bobby’s fate was sealed not by the judge assigned to his case, but by a substitute — and soon after, Judge Johnson himself admitted he could not remain due to a conflict of interest and stepped aside. That alone should set off alarm bells. How can any conviction stand when: The assigned judge abandons the bench, A substitute judge takes over a life-altering trial, and The original judge later steps away, acknowledging he should never have been involved at all? This recusal doesn’...